[Current mortality from war injuries-A narrative review]. / Aktuelle Mortalität von Kriegsverletzungen ­ eine narrative Übersichtsarbeit.

BACKGROUND: The war in Ukraine has led to a strategic reorientation of the German Armed Forces towards national and alliance defense. This has also raised the need for medical and surgical adaptation to scenarios of conventional warfare. In order to develop appropriate and effective concepts it is necessary to identify those war injuries that are associated with a relevant primary and secondary mortality and that can be influenced by medical measures (potentially survivable injuries). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this selective literature review was to identify war injuries with high primary and secondary mortality. METHODS: A selective literature review was performed in the PubMed® database with the search terms war OR combat AND injury AND mortality from 2001 to 2023. Studies including data of war injuries and associated mortality were included. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies were included in the analysis. Severe traumatic brain injury and thoracoabdominal hemorrhage were the main contributors to primary mortality. Injuries to the trunk, neck, traumatic brain injury, and burns were associated with relevant secondary mortality. Among potentially survivable injuries, thoracoabdominal hemorrhage accounted for the largest proportion. Prehospital blood transfusions and short transport times significantly reduced war-associated mortality. CONCLUSION: Control of thoracoabdominal hemorrhage has the highest potential to reduce mortality in modern warfare. Besides that, treatment of traumatic brain injury, burns and neck injuries has a high relevance in reducing mortality. Hospitals of the German Armed Forces need to focus on these requirements.

Survival benefits of interventional radiology and surgical teams collaboration during primary trauma surveys: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: A team approach is essential for effective trauma management. Close collaboration between interventional radiologists and surgeons during the initial management of trauma patients is important for prompt and accurate trauma care. This study aimed to determine whether trauma patients benefit from close collaboration between interventional radiology (IR) and surgical teams during the primary trauma survey. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted between 2014 and 2021 at a single institution. Patients were assigned to an embolization group (EG), a surgery group (SG), or a combination group (CG) according to their treatment. The primary and secondary outcomes were survival at hospital discharge compared with the probability of survival (Ps) and the time course of treatment. RESULTS: The analysis included 197 patients, consisting of 135 men and 62 women, with a median age of 56 [IQR, 38-72] years and an injury severity score of 20 [10-29]. The EG, SG, and CG included 114, 48, and 35 patients, respectively. Differences in organ injury patterns were observed between the three groups. In-hospital survival rates in all three groups were higher than the Ps. In particular, the survival rate in the CG was 15.5% higher than the Ps (95% CI: 7.5-23.6%; p < 0.001). In the CG, the median time for starting the initial procedure was 53 [37-79] min and the procedure times for IR and surgery were 48 [29-72] min and 63 [35-94] min, respectively. Those times were significantly shorter among three groups. CONCLUSION: Close collaboration between IR and surgical teams, including the primary survey, improves the survival of severe trauma patients who require both IR procedures and surgeries by improving appropriate treatment selection and reducing the time process.

Burn or trauma scoring: experience of the burn unit of the Queen Astrid Military Hospital during the terror attacks on 22 March 2016.

PURPOSE: On 22 March 2016, the burn unit (BU) of Queen Astrid Military Hospital assessed a surge in severely injured victims from terror attacks at the national airport and Maalbeek subway station according to the damage control resuscitation (DCR) and damage control surgery (DCS) principles. This study delves into its approach to identify a suitable triage scoring system and to determine if a BU can serve as buffer capacity for mass casualty incidents (MCIs). METHODS: The study reviewed retrospectively the origin of explosion, demographic data, sustained injuries, performed surgery, and length of stay of all admitted patients. Trauma scores (Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS)) and triage scores (Revised Trauma Score (RTS), New Trauma Score (NTS), and Trauma Score Injury Severity Score (TRISS)), were compared to burn mortality scores (Osler updated Baux Score and Tobiasen's Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI)). RESULTS: Of the 23 casualties admitted to the BU, the scores calculated on average 3.5 indications for a level 1 trauma center (ISS 4, NISS 6, RTS 0, T-NTS 4). Nevertheless, no deaths occurred during admission or the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: MCIs create chaos and a high demand for care. Avoiding bottlenecks and adhering to the DCR/DCS principles are necessary to deliver the best care to the largest number of people. This study indicates that a BU can serve as buffer capacity for MCIs. Nevertheless, its integration into the medical resilience plan depends on accurate scoring, comprehensive care availability, and understanding of the DCR/DCS concept. NTS for triage seems the best fit for scoring polytrauma referrals to a BU during MCIs.

Use of jejunal serosal patch and pyloric exclusion in the management of complex duodenal injury.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal injuries are relatively rare but remain a management challenge with a high incidence of postoperative complications. Guidelines from the World Society of Emergency Surgery and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma favour a primary repair for less-complex injuries, but the management of more complex duodenal trauma remains controversial with varying techniques supported, including pyloric exclusion, omental or jejunal patch closure, gastrojejunostomy and pancreatoduodenectomy. We describe the techniques used in one case of complex duodenal trauma. TECHNIQUE: The duodenum is approached via a standard laparotomy with Kocherisation. Primary repair of the duodenal perforations is performed using a 3/0 polydioxanone suture (PDS), followed by mobilisation of a loop of mid-jejunum against the area of duodenal trauma over the primary repair as a jejunal serosal patch. The antimesenteric jejunal serosal border is sutured to the serosa of the duodenum (serosa only) using a 3/0 PDS. Pyloric exclusion is then performed through an anterior gastrostomy, to control the volume of gastric juice entering the duodenum. The pylorus is sutured closed using an absorbable suture followed by closure of the anterior gastrostomy using a GIA stapling device.

A case of multiple organ injury resuscitated by collaboration of damage control surgery and interventional radiology in hybrid emergency room.

Background: Hybrid emergency room systems, namely hybrid ER (HER), enable us to perform computed tomography (CT), surgery, and interventional radiology (IVR) without patient transfer. HER significantly shortened the time to CT after arrival and allowed us to achieve early intervention, resulting in reduced mortality from exsanguination in patients with severe blunt trauma. Case Presentation: We encountered a patient diagnosed with left common iliac artery occlusion and dissection caused by blunt traumatic compressive abdominal injury with transection of the small intestine, kidney, and adrenal and pelvic ring fractures. Although the patient experienced cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) immediately after CT, we performed damage control surgery (DCS) and IVR after temporary aortic occlusion in the HER and resuscitated the patient. Conclusion: The present case, in which rapid diagnosis and intervention were performed and the patient was successfully resuscitated, supports the efficacy of the HER system for managing severe blunt trauma.

Evaluating the effectiveness and outcomes associated with direct peritoneal resuscitation in damage control surgery patients with and without hemorrhagic shock.

INTRODUCTION: This narrative review aims to evaluate the efficacy of adjunct direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) in the treatment of adult damage control surgery (DCS) patients both with and without hemorrhagic shock, and its impact on associated outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, ProQuest, and Cochrane were searched for relevant articles published through April 13th, 2023. Studies assessing the utilization of DPR in adult DCS patients were included. Outcomes included time to abdominal closure, intra-abdominal complications, in-hospital mortality, and ICU length of stay (ICU LOS). RESULTS: Five studies evaluating 437 patients were included. In patients with hemorrhagic shock, DPR was associated with reduced time to abdominal closure (DPR 4.1 days, control 5.9 days, p = 0.002), intra-abdominal complications including abscess formation (DPR 27 %, control 47 %, p = 0.04), and ICU LOS (DPR 8 days, control 11 days, p = 0.004). Findings in patients without hemorrhagic shock were conflicting. Closure times were decreased in one study (DPR 5.9 days, control 7.7 days, p < 0.02) and increased in another study (DPR 3.5 days, control 2.5 days, p = 0.02), intra-abdominal complications were decreased in one study (DPR 27 %, control 47 %, p = 0.04) and similar in another, and ICU LOS was decreased in one study (DPR 17 days, control 24 days, p < 0.002) and increased in another (DPR 13 days, control 11.4 days, p = 0.807). CONCLUSION: In patients with hemorrhagic shock, adjunct DPR is associated with reduced time to abdominal closure, intra-abdominal complications such as abscesses, fistula, bleeding, anastomotic leak, and ICU LOS. Utilization of DPR in patients without hemorrhagic shock showed promising but inconsistent findings.

Ultra-forward surgical support for special operations forces. Conception, development and certification of the French Special Operations Surgical Team (SOST) airborne capability.

When special operations forces (SOF) are in action, a surgical team (SOST) is usually ground deployed as close as possible to the combat area, to try and provide surgical support within the golden hour. The French SOST is composed of 6 people: 2 surgeons, 1 scrub nurse, 1 anaesthetist, 1 anesthetic nurse and 1 SOF paramedic. It can be deployed in 45 min under a tent or in a building. However, some tactical situations prevent the ground deployment. A solution is to deploy the SOST in a tactical unprepared aircraft hold, to make it possible to offer DCS, to treat non-compressible exsanguinating trauma, without any ground logistical footprint. This article describes the stages of the design, development and certification process of the airborne SOST capability. The authors report the modifications and adaptations of the equipment and the surgical paradigms which make it possible to solve the constraints linked to the aeronautical and combat environment. Study type/level of evidence Care management Level of Evidence IV.

Visible negative pressure wound therapy for open abdominal management: A single-center retrospective study.

Aim: This study aimed to compare open abdominal management (OAM) between visible negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and commercial NPWT to determine whether NPWT can detect intestinal ischemia in its early stages without causing complications or worsening prognosis, and to determine whether the actual visualization results in early detection. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent OAM with visible NPWT (A: 32 patients) and those who underwent OAM with commercial NPWT (B: 12 patients). We compared background factors, disease severity, vital signs, blood test values, and 28-day outcomes between the two groups. We also checked the records to determine how many visualized cases were detected early and operated on. We then examined the weaknesses of this method. Results: No differences were observed in the background factors or disease severity between the two groups. The duration of the open abdomen and intensive care unit stay were significantly shorter for group A than for group B. The groups showed no significant differences in lactate levels, 28-day outcomes, complications during OAM, or other factors. After a review of the medical records, ischemic progression was detected early, and surgery could be performed in seven cases in the visible NPWT group. The progression of ischemia was confirmed at the time of the second-look operation in two cases in the ascending colon. Conclusion: The visualization device allowed us to gain insights into the intra-abdominal cavity and determine the appropriate time for closing the abdomen without worsening the prognosis.

Diagnosis and emergency surgical management of stercoral colitis-induced colonic ischemia: A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Stercoral colitis is an urgent complication of fecal impaction that requires aggressive management. The rare complicated with bowel ischemia requires a high index of suspicion for early diagnosis. This case report describes the detection and management of this rare and fatal complication of stercoral colitis. CASE PRESENTATION: An 80-year-old man presented after 3 days of obstipation. Abdominal plain radiography revealed several air-fluid levels in the colon with centralized small bowel gas. Computed tomography revealed fecal impaction and stercoral colitis without evidence of bowel ischemia. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Fecal impaction and stercoral colitis without evidence of bowel ischemia was suspected. Owing to the development of refractory septic shock, we performed damage control surgery. Definitive surgery with end ileostomy was follow by 48 h later. The patient was discharged home safely. CONCLUSION: Stercoral colitis-induced ischemia is rare but potentially fatal; ischemia should be highly suspected. CT can help diagnosed of stercoral colitis but no single parameters for diagnosed of bowel ischemia. Prompt resuscitation and surgical exploration with damage control surgery are recommended.

Damage Control Surgery and Transfer in Emergency General Surgery.

Selective non traumatic emergency surgery patients are targets for damage control surgery (DCS) to prevent or treat abdominal compartment syndrome and the lethal triad. However, DCS is still a subject of controversy. As a concept, DCS describes a series of abbreviated surgical procedures to allow rapid source control of hemorrhage and contamination in patients with circulatory shock to allow resuscitation and stabilization in the intensive care unit followed by delayed return to the operating room for definitive surgical management once the patient becomes physiologic stable. If appropriately applied, the DCS morbidity and mortality can be significantly reduced.

Assessment of Risk Factors for Enteric Fistula and Intra-Abdominal Sepsis in Patients with Open Abdomen in Trauma: An Original Research.

Introduction: In emergency surgeries, open abdomen or laparostomy, especially with perforated viscus, has been used primarily to prevent delayed ventral hernia, burst abdomen, and abdominal compartment syndrome. In the present study, the clinical and resuscitative factors that are linked with open abdomen morbidity are evaluated. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis was done for all the subjects who were admitted at the tertiary care center between May 2020 and May 2022 for the open abdomen surgeries. These patients were examined to see whether they needed more postoperative care than usual, including the need for resuscitative treatments and other critical clinical indicators. Patients were evaluated if they had any complications. The data that were collected were analysed for any variance using analysis of variance considering P <.05 as significant. Results: A total of 100 subjects were analysed in this study. Forty nine patients had intra-abdominal sepsis of the 100 cases examined from historical case records and 1 had entero-cutaneous fistulas. These patients did not necessitate additional actions for intensive care unit care, resuscitation, an chest infection, extended hospital stay, or any disabilities compared to those who did not undergo laparotomy during the same period. In this group of patients with open abdomens, the immediate postoperative period was not linked to an increase in resuscitation efforts or a load on clinical staff. Once patients are stabilized, early definitive abdominal closure is advised to prevent problems associated to laparostomies. Conclusion: The quantity of initial fluid revival and the coagulation factors at the time of admission are not related to intra-abdominal sepsis and enteric fistula following laparostomy after significant abdominal injuries.

Surgical treatment and anticoagulant therapy for liver injury due to cardiopulmonary resuscitation with lethal pulmonary embolization: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can sometimes induce organ injury, however, such an occurrence is rare. We herein report a case of liver injury due to CPR with life-threatening pulmonary embolization (PE) that required the patient to undergo surgical hemostasis and antithrombotic therapy. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A woman in her 70s fell off her bicycle. She suffered cardiopulmonary arrest and underwent CPR. She was diagnosed with PE and underwent catheter treatment and anticoagulant therapy; however, her blood pressure did not increase. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed injury to the liver and inferior phrenic artery. Hemostasis could not be completely achieved by transcatheter arterial embolization alone. She was therefore transferred to our hospital and underwent damage control surgery (DCS). Definitive surgery (DS) performed 33 h after DCS showed right hepatic subcapsular hematoma and left hepatic subcapsular hematoma. We cut away the capsules and removed the hematomas. There were lacerations and oozing under the capsule in the left lobe. We sutured the laceration. At 72 h after undergoing DS, antithrombotic therapy was started. On day 19, the patient was discharged home by herself without any neurological damage. DISCUSSION: For a case of liver injury due to CPR with life-threatening PE, treatment with both hemostasis and antithrombotic therapy should be performed. Antithrombotic therapy was started appropriately in this case by accurately identifying the liver laceration and suturing it. CONCLUSION: Hemostasis following both DCS and DS with appropriate anticoagulant therapy was effective for the management of liver injury due to CPR with life-threatening PE.

Hepatic compartment syndrome treated with damage control surgery and transarterial embolization: A case report.

Background: Hepatic compartment syndrome (HCS) is a complication of nonoperative management in patients with blunt hepatic injury. Although decompression of elevated intrahepatic pressure through surgical exploration or drainage and hemorrhage control are required to manage this condition, evidence for such a management for this complication is insufficient. Herein, we report a pediatric patient treated with a planned combination strategy of surgical decompression with perihepatic packing to reduce intrahepatic pressure and subcapsular hemorrhage control as well as angioembolization to control intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Case presentation: A 12-year-old boy was referred to our emergency department 5 h after sustaining severe bruising in the upper abdomen in a traffic accident. Computed tomography (CT) showed an intraparenchymal hematoma in the right lobe of the liver; nonoperative management was selected based on stable hemodynamic status. Two days after the injury, he complained of severe abdominal pain and shock. CT showed an intraparenchymal and large subcapsular hematoma with right branch compression of the portal vein and extravasation of contrast material. Laboratory data showed progression of hepatocellular damage. We successfully managed this patient with a planned combination strategy of surgical decompression with perihepatic packing for reduction of intrahepatic pressure and subcapsular hemorrhage control, followed by angioembolization for control of intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Conclusion: Our study suggests that for the management of HCS, a planned combination strategy of damage control surgery and angioembolization is a therapeutic option.

Surgical management of high-grade pancreatic injuries: Insights from a high-volume pancreaticobiliary specialty unit.

BACKGROUND: The management of high-grade pancreatic trauma is controversial. AIM: To review our single-institution experience on the surgical management of blunt and penetrating pancreatic injuries. METHODS: A retrospective review of records was performed on all patients undergoing surgical intervention for high-grade pancreatic injuries [American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Grade III or greater] at the Royal North Shore Hospital in Sydney between January 2001 and December 2022. Morbidity and mortality outcomes were reviewed, and major diagnostic and operative challenges were identified. RESULTS: Over a twenty-year period, 14 patients underwent pancreatic resection for high-grade injuries. Seven patients sustained AAST Grade III injuries and 7 were classified as Grades IV or V. Nine underwent distal pancreatectomy and 5 underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Overall, there was a predominance of blunt aetiologies (11/14). Concomitant intra-abdominal injuries were observed in 11 patients and traumatic haemorrhage in 6 patients. Three patients developed clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas and there was one in-hospital mortality secondary to multi-organ failure. Among stable presentations, pancreatic ductal injuries were missed in two-thirds of cases (7/12) on initial computed tomography imaging and subsequently diagnosed on repeat imaging or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. All patients who sustained complex pancreaticoduodenal trauma underwent PD without mortality. The management of pancreatic trauma is evolving. Our experience provides valuable and locally relevant insights into future management strategies. CONCLUSION: We advocate that high-grade pancreatic trauma should be managed in high-volume hepato-pancreato-biliary specialty surgical units. Pancreatic resections including PD may be indicated and safely performed with appropriate specialist surgical, gastroenterology, and interventional radiology support in tertiary centres.

Evidence-Based Pearls: Chest Trauma.

The challenge in caring for patients who sustain traumatic chest injuries centers on their complex needs from high acuity and the potential for multisystem effects and complications. Hemorrhage and respiratory compromise are common sequela of thoracic trauma. Patients must be resuscitated and their injuries managed with the primary goals of restoring cardiopulmonary structural integrity and preventing complications. There are evolving strategies for the management of the thoracic trauma victim including damage control resuscitation and surgery, endovascular repairs, and assessments implementing severity scores to aid in planning interventions.

Traumatic hemorrhage and chain of survival.

Trauma is the number one cause of death among Americans between the ages of 1 and 46 years, costing more than $670 billion a year. Following death related to central nervous system injury, hemorrhage accounts for the majority of remaining traumatic fatalities. Among those with severe trauma that reach the hospital alive, many may survive if the hemorrhage and traumatic injuries are diagnosed and adequately treated in a timely fashion. This article aims to review the recent advances in pathophysiology management following a traumatic hemorrhage as well as the role of diagnostic imaging in identifying the source of hemorrhage. The principles of damage control resuscitation and damage control surgery are also discussed. The chain of survival for severe hemorrhage begins with primary prevention; however, once trauma has occurred, prehospital interventions and hospital care with early injury recognition, resuscitation, definitive hemostasis, and achieving endpoints of resuscitation become paramount. An algorithm is proposed for achieving these goals in a timely fashion as the median time from onset of hemorrhagic shock and death is 2 h.

Is damage control surgery useful in the treatment of colorectal perforation? A single-center case-control study.

Colorectal perforation with systemic peritonitis requires prompt surgical attention, and damage control surgery (DCS) is performed in patients with severe injuries. This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the efficacy of DCS in patients with colonic perforation. Materials and Methods: From January 2013 to December 2019, 131 patients with colorectal perforation underwent emergency surgery at our hospital. Among these, 95 patients required postoperative intensive care unit management and were included in this study; of these patients, 29 (31%) underwent DCS, and 66 (69%) underwent primary abdominal closure (PC). Results: Patients who underwent DCS had significantly higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (23.9 [19.5-29.5] vs. 17.6 [13.7-22]; P<0.0001) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (9 [7-11] vs. 6 [3-8]; P<0.0001) scores than did those who underwent PC. The initial operation time was significantly shorter for DCS than for PC (99 [68-112] vs. 146 [118-171]; P<0.0001). The 30-day mortality and colostomy rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The results suggest that DCS is useful in the management of acute generalized peritonitis caused by colorectal perforation.

Pancreatoduodenectomía de urgencia. Revisión de 2 casos clínicos

Introducción: La pancreatoduodenectomía de urgencia (PDDU) es una cirugía reservada para lesiones graves pancreatoduodenales secundarias a trauma, lesiones inflamatorias o posterior a procedimientos endoscópicos. Objetivo: Describir dos casos clínicos en los que se realizó PDDU. Casos Clínicos: Se reportan 2 casos clínicos en los cuales se requirió una PDD. En el primer caso secundario a úlcera duodenal perforada que comprometía más del 50% del lumen asociado a biliperitoneo y fistula duodenal sin control; y en el segundo, a consecuencia de un trauma por herida de bala con perforación duodenal, íleon distal y desgarro de 1,5 cm en cabeza de páncreas. Discusión: En la actualidad no existe un consenso sobre las indicaciones de PPDU, sin embargo esta compleja cirugía representa una opción de tratamiento en pacientes bien seleccionados, cuando la cirugía de control de daños y los intentos de controlar la necrosis y fistulas duodenales han fracasado. Conclusión: El tratamiento de una lesión pancreática y duodenal compleja puede requerir PDDU. Sin embargo, en pacientes inestables se debe considerar una cirugía en dos tiempos por un equipo de cirujanos experimentados.

Introduction: Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy (UPDD) is a surgery reserved for severe pancreaticoduodenal injuries secondary to trauma, inflammatory injuries or after endoscopic procedures. Aim: To describe two clinical cases in which PDDU was performed. Clinical Cases: 2 clinical cases are reported in which a PDDU was required. The first case was secondary to a perforated duodenal ulcer that compromised more than 50% of the lumen associated with biliperitoneum uncontrolled duodenal fistula; in the second one, as a consequence of a gunshot wound trauma with duodenal perforation, distal ileum and a 1.5 cm tear in the head of pancreas. Discussion: Currently there is no consensus on the indications for UPDD, however this complex surgery represents a treatment option in well-selected patients, when damage control surgery and attempts to control necrosis and duodenal fistulas have failed. Conclusión: Treatment of a complex pancreatic and duodenal injury may require pancreatoduodenectomy. However, in unstable patients, a two-stage surgery should be considered by an experienced surgical team.

Hypertonic saline infusion does not improve the chance of primary fascial closure after damage control laparotomy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous observational studies showed higher rates of abdominal wall closure with the use of hypertonic saline in trauma patients with abdominal injuries. However, no randomized controlled trials have been performed on this matter. This double-blind randomized clinical trial assessed the effect of 3% hypertonic saline (HS) solution on primary fascial closure and the timing of abdominal wall closure among patients who underwent damage control laparotomy for bleeding control. METHODS: Double-blind randomized clinical trial. Patients with abdominal injuries requiring damage control laparotomy (DCL) were randomly allocated to receive a 72-h infusion (rate: 50 mL/h) of 3% HS or 0.9 N isotonic saline (NS) after the index DCL. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with abdominal wall closure in the first seven days after the index DCL. RESULTS: The study was suspended in the first interim analysis because of futility. A total of 52 patients were included. Of these, 27 and 25 were randomly allocated to NS and HS, respectively. There were no significant differences in the rates of abdominal wall closure between groups (HS: 19 [79.2%] vs. NS: 17 [70.8%]; p = 0.71). In contrast, significantly higher hypernatremia rates were observed in the HS group (HS: 11 [44%] vs. NS: 1 [3.7%]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This double-blind randomized clinical trial showed no benefit of HS solution in primary fascial closure rates. Patients randomized to HS had higher sodium concentrations after the first day and were more likely to present hypernatremia. We do not recommend using HS in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy. Trial registration The trial protocol was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT02542241).